30s Summary

Bitcoin’s price could reach $200,000, according to BCA Research’s analysis using the 260-day fractal dimension complexity metric, which identifies patterns in price fluctuations. Although Bitcoin’s price is volatile, the analysis suggests we have not reached the peak of the bull market. The recent surge in Bitcoin’s price, partially due to election speculation, indicates a long-term upward trend. BCA Research also suggests Bitcoin and gold increase in value with growing global wealth as they serve as insurance against hyperinflation and banking system failure.

Full Article

Bitcoin has been on a crazy ride recently, and some experts are saying it could go even higher. According to analysis from BCA Research, the price could even hit $200,000. That’s based on a measure called the 260-day fractal dimension complexity. This is a fancy way of saying they’re looking for patterns in Bitcoin’s price changes over 260 days.

According to this metric, we’re not even near the levels seen at previous peaks of bull markets, meaning the price could still skyrocket. The measure uses fractals, which are essentially repeating patterns you often see in nature and maths. It’s a common tool used to predict movements in financial markets.

The importance of this complexity is that, if it’s high, it means the price is having wild swings making it harder to predict where it’s going to go next. If it’s low, on the other hand, it means the price is more stable and predictable. This can sometimes lure people into a false sense of security thinking that trends will continue when they might not. Low scores on this measure are usually seen at the top of bull markets.

BCA Research are saying that while Bitcoin’s recent leap in price was partly because of election speculation, the price could still soar way higher. So while there could be a short-term dip or two along the way, they believe the long-term trend of increasing prices is still in place, which is what led them to their prediction of a $200,000+ price target.

Finally, they suggest that as global wealth increases, Bitcoin and gold get more valuable, too. The idea here is that both these assets can be seen as a kind of insurance against hyperinflation, banking system failure, or state intervention, so a certain amount of total global wealth should be in them.